Clik here to view.
• An article looked ahead to a decision by the supreme court on whether hundreds of people whose wrongful convictions have been quashed by the court of appeal can be found to have suffered a miscarriage of justice and therefore may be entitled to compensation. The article incorrectly stated that the conviction of Sîon Jenkins for the killing of his foster daughter, Billie-Jo Jenkins, was overturned after juries failed to reach verdicts at two retrials: in fact, his conviction was quashed by the court of appeal and then juries at the two retrials failed to reach a verdict (Supreme court to rule on what 'miscarriage of justice means', 9 May, page 10).
• A slip of the tongue by an organiser of a walk in London to protest at remarks by a Canadian police officer – that women who want to stay safe on the streets "should avoid dressing like sluts" – led to the organiser being quoted in early editions as saying "Comments like these only serve to shame victims into violence"; that should have been "silence". The article also incorrectly suggested that she was the sole organiser (Women protesters bring 'SlutWalking' phenomenon to UK, 10 May, page 9).
• Television pick of the day for Thursday, 12 May, previews the BBC's Inside The Human Body, and predicted viewers might tune in out of "mere morbidity". It would have been more accurate to use morbidness. To clarify: morbidity relates to or is characterised by disease (7 May, page 87, the Guide).
Contacts for Guardian/guardian.co.uk departments and staff can be found through the Contact us link on our website homepage. To contact the readers' editor's office, which looks at queries about accuracy and standards, email reader@guardian.co.uk including article details and web link; write to The readers' editor, Kings Place, 90 York Way, London N1 9GU; or phone +44 (0)20 3353 4736 between 11am and 5pm UK time Monday to Friday excluding public holidays. The Guardian's policy is to correct significant errors as soon as possible.
